Is It Time To Reconsider Short Vol?

Oct 4, 2019


Global risks are rising, the Cboe’s Volatility Index is whipsawing and yet selling options is still more popular than buying. For sure, buying options means managing carry costs. But as the ongoing popularity of short vol strategies and the weight of options selling contributes to compression of the volatility risk premium, it could be time to consider (again) whether selling volatility is still worth the risk.

That, in essence, was the argument made by Dominick Paoloni, chief investment officer and founder at IPS Strategic Capital in Denver, in a recent paper he published on IPS’s website with his colleague and head trader Patrick Hennessy. The return from selling options is falling, Paoloni argued, and the return on owning optionality is rising. Since the summer, a strategy that has been buying 30-day at-the-money Standard & Poor’s calls with 10 days to expiration has outperformed comparable options selling strategies, he noted. “I think the value’s always been on the long side, but the big problem with the long side has been carry,” Paoloni said, noting that it is not easy to find strategies that can manage that. “I really think that’s the value, that’s where you get your positive convexity, if you can reduce your carry, that’s where there’s edge,” he said. IPS’ flagship long volatility mutual fund is up 8.31% net as of Sept 30. The firm also runs a suite of long volatility strategies including a long vol hedge overlay with a low carry cost and other custom-structured products, and it is about to launch a relative value strategy that trades the basis spread between the VIX and VIX futures.

Paoloni is not the only person raising concerns about vol risk premium products and touting ways to make long volatility strategies work. IPS’ paper cites work by QVR’s Benn Eifert, presented at Cboe RMC earlier this year and at Global EQD, that documented the scale of short-vol positioning. Chris Cole, founder of Artemis Capital Management, has notoriously used a sliding scale of gruesome images to depict the risks of short volatility products. His Artemis Hedgehog has also fared well in recent months. And maybe other investors are starting to catch on, too. Last week, strategists at Bank of America Merrill Lynch were pitching long volatility plays as an equity replacement strategy. “Our house view remains bullish risk assets, but an abundance of headwinds and risks are challenging a stronger move higher in U.S. equities,” strategists wrote. “Options offer attractive alternatives to outright equity exposure for investors looking to participate in a potential breakout but who remain wary of near-term risks.” The BofAML recommendation was to consider Standard & Poor’s calendar risk reversals, selling a three-month put and buying a one-month call.

DISCLAIMER: The information on this website should not be misconstrued as an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation to buy or sell securities. The performance data represents past performance data. With any investment, past performance is not necessarily indicative of future performance. The Absolute Return Strategy performance is representative of a size-weighted composite of the accounts managed by the firm classified as the Absolute Return Strategy-Moderate composite. The returns represent net returns of clients invested into the strategy, accounting for the 1% annual management fee. Please note that all performance in 2011 represents one non-fee paying account comprised of the firm’s capital. Due to the nature of composite performance, it cannot be guaranteed that an investor in a specific composite will receive the same gains as the size-weighted average of the composite. As of April of 2016, the separately managed accounts in the ARS–Moderate composite gain their exposure to the ARS through a 40 Act fund that utilizes the Absolute Return Strategy. The performance of the ARS shown on this sheet still represents the size-weighted average of the SMA’s that are part of the ARS-Moderate.

The Absolute Return Strategy invests in derivatives securities. Specifically, the fund sells and buys put and call options and sometimes utilizes leverage; these factors can cause portfolios invested in the strategy to show greater fluctuations than investments in the underlying assets. Prior to buying or selling an option, investors must read a copy of the Characteristics & Risks of Standardized Options. Put options give the purchaser the right, not the obligation, to sell a specified number of shares of the underlying security at a specific date in the future. The seller of a put option has the obligation, not the right, to have a number of shares delivered to them at a specified price at a specified date in the future in exchange for receiving a premium upfront for this risk. The seller of a call option has the obligation, not the right, to deliver a specified number of shares to the buyer at a specified price at a specified date in the future in exchange for receiving a premium upfront for this risk. The risk of buying either a put or call option is limited to the premium paid for said option.

The performance of the S&P 500 Index is representative of price returns not including dividends over the specified time period.
The performance of the AGG Index (Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index) is representative of the total return including reinvestment of dividends. These indexes are unmanaged and thus it is impossible to invest directly into these indexes.

One should always consult an investment advisor before making any investment decisions as well as consider the investment’s objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing or sending money. This and other important information about the Strategy is available upon request.

Please click here to read our Disclosure Notice.